Courts

The Constitution, Article III provides that; ". . . The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good behavior. . . . In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consul, . . . the supreme court shall have original Jurisdiction. . . . The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury . . ." Thus, except in cases of Impeachment, Federal judges may not be removed from office, except by their resignation or death.

Many of the Court.s decisions seem to be partisan driven. Four Supreme Court decisions, in which each contains a seed that could lead to destruction of our Nation, ranked by order of "onerous-ness" are:

1. "Campaign contributions (bribery), as a form of speech, is protected by the 1^st Amendment."
2. "Corporations have the same rights as individuals."
3. "Any State to which a slave is imported is a Slave State."
4. "We the Court elect George W. Bush president."

As it should be, there is no provision in the Constitution for either our Executive Branch nor Legislative Branch to review performance of Federal judges.

However, The Declaration of Independence says; " . . . whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends (life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, . . .

Amendment X states, "The powers not delegated to te United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People."

The People have the right to review performance of all branches of Government.

When the Court concurred with the argument that campaign donations by corporations are legal because they constitute a means of communication (money talks) the Court ignored Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. That section defines "Bribery" as a High Crime . a crime against the sovereign . the People. That decision has disenfranchised all US citizens who have not stolen enough money so they can make themselves heard by the elected officials they are able to buy.

Following the Tobacco Industry being found Guilty, the jury established a fine that appears to have been intended to bankrupt the industry . a fair outcome considering the damage intentionally done by the industry in the name of Corporate Profit. The courts interceded and allowed payment of the fine to be spread over several years, which allowed the industry to remain healthy and continue in business. This court intercession may have violated Amendment VII which says . " . . . and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, . . . ."